How to cancel NordVPN30-day money-back window
Stopping the renewal and getting money back are two different actions. Here is the order, and how NordVPN's window compares.
Two different things get called "cancelling NordVPN": stopping the subscription from renewing, and asking for money back on what you have already paid. They are separate actions, they are done in different places, and doing the first does not start the second.
NordVPN publishes a 30-day money-back window. Here is how it compares with the rest of the field we track, and what the window does and does not cover.
- 30 days is NordVPN's published window
- Stopping auto-renewal and requesting a refund are different actions
- The window generally runs from purchase, not from first use
- App-store purchases are handled by the store, not the provider
- Money-back windows across the field run from 7 to 45 days
Money-back windows across the providers we track
Read from each provider's own pricing page. The spread is wider than people expect, and one entry has a condition attached that is routinely dropped when it is quoted.
| VPN | Money-back window | Operates under |
|---|---|---|
| ExpressVPN | 30 days | Not published in our set |
| NordVPN | 30 days | Panama |
| Surfshark | 30 days | the Netherlands |
| CyberGhost | 45 days (6-month and 2-year plans; 14 days on monthly) | Not published in our set |
| Private Internet Access | 30 days | the United States |
| Mullvad VPN | 14 days | Sweden |
| Windscribe | 7 days | Canada |
Collected by VPN LIFE from each provider's own site.
NordVPN's 30-day window runs from the date of purchase, not from first use. Renewals are not covered by it — the guarantee applies to the initial purchase, which is the detail that catches people who let a two-year plan roll over.
Stop the renewal first
Whatever else you do, turn off automatic renewal before the date. This is the step that prevents the next charge, and it is independent of any refund request. It lives in the account area on the provider's own site — or, if you subscribed through an app store, in the store's subscription settings, where the provider cannot reach it.
That last point is the most common source of confusion. If you bought through an app store, the provider's own account page may show nothing to cancel, because the billing relationship is with the store.
Then, if you are inside the window, ask for the money back
- Check the date you purchased, not the date you first used it.
- Use the provider's own support channel — live chat where it exists is consistently faster than email.
- Say plainly that you are requesting a refund under the money-back guarantee and give the purchase date.
- Expect to be offered an alternative — an extension, a different plan. Declining once is usually enough.
- Keep the transcript. If the refund does not appear, that is what you will need.
The two mistakes that cost people the refund
Almost every account of a refused refund we have seen comes down to one of two things, and both are avoidable.
Counting from the wrong date. The window runs from purchase. People who buy a plan, get busy, and start using it three weeks later have three weeks less than they think. If you are not going to use it immediately, either buy it later or put the deadline in your calendar the day you pay.
Assuming a renewal is covered. Guarantees are written for the initial purchase. A two-year plan that renews automatically is a fresh charge with no fresh window, and by the time it appears on a statement the period for disputing the original purchase is long gone. Turning off automatic renewal the day you subscribe removes this entirely, and costs you nothing — the subscription still runs to the end of the term you paid for.
Before you go: what problem are you actually solving?
A large share of cancellations we would expect to see are people whose connection was slow, and slow is usually a route rather than a provider. Across 14 cities and 46 paired runs we measured between 40% and 90% of the raw line surviving the tunnel — the same two services keeping about 90% in London and about half in Tokyo. If the problem is speed, changing city is worth trying before changing company.
If the problem is a service that will not unblock, the same logic applies: the number of cities a provider has in the country you need is what decides whether you have a second move. Four of the seven providers we track publish two or more Japanese cities; three publish exactly one.
How much speed actually survives the tunnel
Every VPN site says a tunnel costs you speed. Almost none of them say how much. We measured it by hand rather than repeating a claim: 14 cities, 46 paired runs, comparing NordVPN and Surfshark against the same raw line in the same session. In the 11 cities where we also measured the bare line, the share that survived the tunnel ranged from 40% to 90%.
| City | Raw line | NordVPN | Surfshark | Paired runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tokyo | 780 Mbps | 444.9 Mbps (57%) | 399.9 Mbps (51%) | 9 |
| London | 790 Mbps | 712.6 Mbps (90%) | 713.5 Mbps (90%) | 9 |
| New York | 760 Mbps | 598.9 Mbps (79%) | 556.6 Mbps (73%) | 7 |
| Los Angeles | 530 Mbps | 358.8 Mbps (68%) | 305.8 Mbps (58%) | 5 |
Measured by VPN LIFE. Raw-line figures are rounded to the nearest 10 Mbps. Percentages are the share of the raw line that survived.
- 14 cities, 46 paired runs, measured by hand
- 11 of those cities also have the bare line measured
- 40% to 90% of the raw line survived
- We only name a winner in 4 cities — the rest have too few runs
The spread between cities is larger than the spread between providers. In London roughly nine tenths of the line survived on both services; in Tokyo it was closer to half. That is worth knowing before you blame the provider: "this VPN is slow" is usually "this route is slow".
We only call a winner in a city when we have five or more paired runs there and the gap is at least 10%. That threshold is met in 4 of the 14 cities — Tokyo and Los Angeles, where NordVPN averaged ahead, and London and New York, where the two were level. In the remaining ten cities we publish the numbers and say the sample is too small, rather than ranking on one run.
How much of the line survived the tunnel
How long you have to change your mind
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If you are moving rather than leaving
We rank on what we can check. Each of the five below publishes a location in this comparison; the tables are our own counts and the providers' own published terms, not a summary of their marketing.
ExpressVPN: the widest spread of cities
ExpressVPN publishes more multi-city countries than anyone else in our set — 11 countries where you can pick between two or more locations, including 56 in the United States, 7 in the United Kingdom, 6 in Australia and 4 in Japan. If your problem is a blocked address rather than a missing country, that spread is the thing that gets you out of it. It is the most expensive option here, and it is the one we would pick for streaming.
| ExpressVPN | |
|---|---|
| Locations in this country | 4 cities |
| Countries covered | 112 of the 155 we count |
| Money-back window | 30 days |
ExpressVPN in use

NordVPN: the largest country list, and the one we measured
NordVPN covers more countries than anything else we track. It is also one of the two services we measured ourselves, so the retention figures above are its actual numbers rather than a claim. It operates from Panama, has been audited by Deloitte, allows 10 simultaneous connections, and lists obfuscated servers and a kill switch among its features — the two things that matter where VPN traffic is filtered.
| NordVPN | |
|---|---|
| Locations in this country | 2 cities |
| Countries covered | 149 of the 155 we count |
| Money-back window | 30 days |
| Operates under the law of | Panama |
| No-logs claim examined by | Deloitte |
| Features the provider names | Threat Protection, Double VPN, obfuscated servers, Meshnet, dedicated IP, kill switch and split tunnelling |
NordVPN in use

Surfshark: unlimited devices, and level with NordVPN in half our tests
Surfshark is the other service in our own measurements. In London and New York it was level with NordVPN; in Tokyo and Los Angeles it trailed by 11% and 17%. It places no limit on simultaneous connections, which makes it the sensible choice for a household rather than a person. Audited by Deloitte, operating from the Netherlands, with Camouflage Mode for networks that filter VPN traffic.
| Surfshark | |
|---|---|
| Locations in this country | 1 city |
| Countries covered | 100 of the 155 we count |
| Money-back window | 30 days |
| Operates under the law of | the Netherlands |
| No-logs claim examined by | Deloitte |
| Features the provider names | CleanWeb, Dynamic MultiHop, rotating IP, Camouflage Mode, kill switch and split tunnelling (Bypasser) |
Surfshark in use

CyberGhost: the longest money-back window, with a catch
CyberGhost's 45-day money-back guarantee is the longest here, and it is the reason it appears on most lists. Read the condition: 45 days applies to the six-month and two-year plans, and the monthly plan gets 14 days. It publishes 10 multi-city countries, with 11 locations in the United States, but only a single city in Japan — so it is a weaker choice if Japanese services are your target.
| CyberGhost | |
|---|---|
| Locations in this country | 1 city |
| Countries covered | 100 of the 155 we count |
| Money-back window | 45 days (six-month and two-year plans; 14 days on monthly) |
CyberGhost in use

Private Internet Access: unlimited connections, US jurisdiction
PIA places no limit on devices and publishes an Advanced Kill Switch, obfuscation, multi-hop and port forwarding. Its no-logs claim has been audited by Deloitte Audit Romania. The trade-off is jurisdiction: it operates from the United States, which some readers will rule out on principle. We list it because the rest of the record is strong and because it is one of only four providers with two or more cities in Japan.
| Private Internet Access | |
|---|---|
| Locations in this country | 2 cities |
| Countries covered | 92 of the 155 we count |
| Money-back window | 30 days |
| Operates under the law of | the United States |
| No-logs claim examined by | Deloitte (Deloitte Audit Romania) |
| Features the provider names | unlimited connections, PIA MACE ad and tracker blocking, Advanced Kill Switch, split tunnelling, multi-hop, obfuscation and port forwarding |
Private Internet Access in use

Frequently asked questions
Will I be charged again while the refund is processed?
You can be, if the renewal date falls in between. That is why turning off automatic renewal first is the right order — it is the step that stops the next charge, regardless of what happens with the refund.
What if I bought through an app store?
The store's refund policy applies rather than the provider's, and the provider generally cannot process it for you. Cancel in the store's subscription settings and make any refund request there.
Does the window cover renewals?
Generally not. Money-back guarantees are written for the initial purchase, which is why a plan that quietly renews after two years is the case people get caught by.
Will it slow my connection down?
Yes, and we have measured how much: across 14 cities and 46 paired runs, between 40% and 90% of the raw line survived the tunnel. The variation between cities is wider than the variation between providers — London kept about 90% on both services we tested, Tokyo about half. If a VPN feels slow, the route is a more likely explanation than the provider.
Conclusion
NordVPN publishes 30 days. Stop the renewal first, then request the refund with the purchase date to hand, and use live chat if it is offered.
If speed or a stubborn geo-block is the reason you are leaving, our own measurements and daily server counts are on open data — they may point at a different fix than changing provider.